Archive

OpenAI has applied for a permit tied to filling wetlands for a proposed data center site in the Savannah area. The filing speaks to siting and environmental permitting, but it does not say the project has been approved or built, or what power, water, tax, or land terms would apply.

Amazon is presenting water-usage and dewatering details to a county advisory board, so the filing is about local water impacts tied to a proposed data center project. The excerpt also says Microsoft postponed, but it does not explain whether that change affects the same site or a separate project.

The piece appears to focus on whether Bitcoin mining and related data center plans in western New York are losing momentum, with opposition and a moratorium shaping what can be built. It is about siting and community resistance in Niagara County, not cloud software or chip design.

The project is still meeting organized local resistance in Spartanburg, with the dispute centered on whether the data center should go forward in that community. The headline does not say what project-level commitments are on the table for land, water, taxes, or power, only that opposition remains heated.

Florida data center projects are still attracting investment even as local opposition grows. The story appears to focus on siting and community conflict in southwest Florida, with the public fight centered on whether these projects should move forward.

Connecticut towns are considering bans or moratoriums on data center development. The piece is about local siting and zoning backlash, and it does not describe a specific project commitment to power, water, tax, or land.

This story says a South Korean investor is putting money into Starcloud, a U.S. startup tied to space-based data centers. It does not say where any facility will be built, what power or water it will use, or what local permits or incentives are involved.

The piece is about how Electra is handling local construction pressure tied to a data center and nearby solar farms. It points to a place-specific siting and infrastructure issue, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the project makes on power, water, tax, or land.

The piece is about a rural Nevada data center and the local governments that are still backing it despite local opposition. The filing points to a community fight over whether the project should go forward and what it could mean for water use and local decision-making; it does not, from the excerpt, specify the project's full power, tax, or land terms.

The piece covers local backlash to proposed data centers in Connecticut and the anxiety driving opposition to them. It fits the community and siting beats, with zoning and regulation likely in play, but the excerpt does not say what specific project terms are on the table.

City staff in Fort Worth are responding to public questions about a proposed data center, with the focus on what the project would mean for the city rather than on the operator itself. The excerpt does not say whether the project is approved, how much power or water it would use, or what tax or land terms are involved.

Amazon abandoned a proposed data center project after local opposition from neighbors. The filing and headline point to a siting fight and community pushback, but they do not say the project was approved, built, or tied to any specific power, water, tax, or land commitment beyond the proposed plan.

The piece says ComEd customers in Illinois could be left paying for the grid work needed to connect data centers. It centers on who bears the cost of large-load hookups, not on the data centers themselves.

Google is making concessions while Hermantown officials head toward a vote on a proposed data center. The piece is about local siting and community opposition, and it does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are actually on the table.

The story says Homer City Generation's proposed data center water plans are under scrutiny. It points to a local water and cooling issue tied to a specific project, but the excerpt does not say what water source, usage level, permits, or utility agreements are involved.

The item says the county board is sending moratorium resolutions to the Planning Commission. That signals a local land-use pause and shows the county is considering limits on future development, but the excerpt does not say what kind of projects the moratorium would affect or what rules would change.

Vineland residents are preparing a lawsuit over a data center’s use of natural gas engines that were not permitted. The piece centers on local opposition, regulatory compliance, and the project’s on-site power setup in New Jersey.

Linn County is considering a water study tied to a possible Google data center project, and the company may be asked to help pay for it. The piece is about local water impacts and the public-cost question around a proposed large load in Iowa.

The story is about a proposed Trenton data center and the tax revenue the local school district says it would generate. It is a local money-and-taxation piece tied to a specific project, but the excerpt does not say whether the deal includes abatements, land terms, power, or water commitments.

A judge ordered Talbot County to remove a data center text amendment from its zoning code. The piece is about local zoning control over where data centers can be approved in the county, not about power, water, or project financing.

The piece is about a public comment period tied to a proposed data center water supply near Broadview. It centers on water service for a specific project and the local review process, but the excerpt does not say who the developer is, how much water is involved, or whether any agreement has been approved.

A South Shore town has put a hold on data center development, which puts local siting and zoning decisions at the center of the story. The piece appears to focus on what the pause means for future approvals and for residents weighing the project locally.