Archive

The piece appears to be a local Oklahoma study about claims and concerns around data centers, with the focus on water and cooling. It does not describe a specific project, approval, or hosting commitment in the excerpt.

Kokomo’s mayor is laying out a proposed data center campus in Indiana. The excerpt does not say what land is involved, what the power or water terms are, or what public approvals or incentives are still pending.

The piece concerns objections to an Indiana water draw from the Kankakee River. It points to a water-supply dispute with a clear local environmental and community angle, but the excerpt does not say what project or host site is driving the demand.

Grayslake is publicizing a proposed data center project and the property tax revenue it could bring. The piece appears to focus on local tax benefits and community reaction, not on any final approval or a committed project cost.

Developers held an open house for a proposed data center campus in Greenfield, giving nearby residents a chance to ask questions and react before any buildout is approved. The headline says it is proposed and does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project makes.

The piece is about local opposition to a proposed University of Michigan computing center in Ypsilanti and the environmental justice claims raised against it. It centers on a protest at a data-center-related siting dispute, not on the company’s operations or technical details.

A local group has turned in signatures to force referendums on Amazon data center proposals. The filing is about community opposition and the ballot process, not about the project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.

ComEd's deposit and screening rules for data centers are pushing Midwest regulators toward similar large-load tariffs, though each state is building its own version.

ComEd's deposit and screening rules for data centers are pushing Midwest regulators toward similar large-load tariffs, though each state is building its own version.

Milwaukee’s plan commission gave initial backing to a pause on new data center development. The filing points to local siting and zoning control, but it does not say which projects would be affected or whether the pause would become final.

The piece answers reader questions about a proposed data center vote in Emporia, so the focus is on the local approval process and the public dispute around it. It does not say the project has been built or approved, only that the vote is under discussion.

This piece appears to explain how Governor Moore’s data center order could affect future development in Montgomery County, with a focus on cooling and water-related implications. It looks at a state-level directive as it filters down to a local host community and what the county may be asked to accept or review.

A Nebraska tribe says a proposed data center would threaten its water rights. The filing, as described here, raises a water and community dispute tied to a specific site, but it does not say what the project would draw, where it would be built, or whether any approvals or utility agreements are in place.

Residents are asking county officials to set up a working group to monitor a proposed data center issue. The piece is about local oversight and community response, not a project approval or utility commitment.

The piece says a second hyperscale data center in De Soto is moving ahead while residents push a petition to block development. It centers on siting and local opposition, with the community deciding what the host place will accept.

The piece is about a local official briefing Lincoln County commissioners on the first meeting of Nebraska's data center task force. It signals early state-level discussion of where data centers may go and what that could mean for county siting and utility planning, but the excerpt does not say any project was approved or named.

A Wisconsin report looks at how the state could replace property tax revenue lost through data center incentives. The piece is about the fiscal tradeoff for local governments and the tax side of hosting a data center, not a specific build decision.

Developers are discussing a proposed data center near Mahomet and saying it would not add to local energy or water demand. The filing or reporting leaves open community concern about that claim and does not show a final approval or a committed utility deal.

The piece is about a Wisconsin Rapids politician facing fallout over an email tied to anti-data center signs. It concerns local opposition politics around a proposed data center, not the project’s power, water, tax, or land terms.

Protesters are raising environmental concerns about a proposed data center and its local impacts. The filing excerpt points to community opposition, but it does not say what project commitments were made on power, water, land, tax terms, or approvals.

Mahomet is reopening talks over a possible data center after having turned away an earlier prospect. The filing does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning terms are under discussion, so the project details remain unspecified.

The piece appears to be about a proposed data center project in Amber, Oklahoma, and the claim that it is unlikely to be stopped. The excerpt does not say what the project commits on power, water, taxes, or land, or what objections, approvals, or legal steps are driving that conclusion.