Archive

West Virginia lawmakers have taken county governments out of the decision-making process for data center projects, while residents are still protesting a rumored proposal. The filing points to a siting and local-governance fight, but it does not identify a specific project, operator, or any power, water, tax, or land terms tied to the rumored site.

Pennsylvania's new executive order forces data center developers to self-supply power within their grid zone before the state will even review a permit.

Pennsylvania's new executive order forces data center developers to self-supply power within their grid zone before the state will even review a permit.

The story is about Louisiana’s governor tightening the rules tied to tax breaks for data centers and framing them as industrial projects. It concerns public money and state taxation policy, not a specific build site or utility arrangement.

DCIP Group’s proposed Florida data center campus is running into rezoning trouble. The filing points to a siting fight over whether the project can clear local land-use approval, but it does not say the campus has been approved or built.

The piece is about rural Alabama residents pushing back over concerns that a proposed data center could affect health and water conditions in their area. It centers on local opposition and the community impacts of a specific project, not on the operator's business or technical specifications.

Arkansas’ largest county has adopted data center rules after a judge’s veto was overturned. The piece is about local regulation and land-use control, with the immediate effect falling on future project siting in the county.

The piece is about land sales tied to Meta’s proposed data center site and the role of a state senator in handling those transactions. It points to the siting and money side of a specific project in Alabama, while the excerpt does not say whether the deal included tax terms, zoning changes, or other approvals.

The piece is about a proposed data center campus in Eatonton, Georgia and says the developer is aiming for a future opening. The excerpt does not say what land has been secured, how power will be supplied, whether water use has been committed, or what taxes or incentives are attached.

Walker County’s study committee has finished reviewing proposed restrictions on data centers. The piece is about local siting and regulation, and it appears to concern how the county may limit or condition future projects.

North Carolina’s governor and attorney general are urging data center owners to contribute to the cost of new power plants. The piece is about how the bill for new generation could be shifted onto large-load customers rather than spread across all ratepayers.

The piece is about New Kent officials weighing draft guidelines for data centers, which puts the focus on local siting rules and the county’s control over how projects would be reviewed. The excerpt does not say whether any project was approved, what specific standards are proposed, or whether the guidelines affect taxes, water, or power.

The story is about Virginia lawmakers and how they plan to handle data center growth. It concerns state-level rules and incentives that could affect where projects are built and what they cost local governments and taxpayers.

The piece is about Meta’s proposed data center and what it would require from the host community, with emphasis on power, water, and limited public disclosure. It fits the publication because it treats the project as a local siting and utility burden story rather than a company profile.

Greensboro is asking residents for feedback on data centers through a survey. The piece is about local community response to a possible data center issue, and it does not say what project, if any, is proposed or what commitments it would bring on land, power, water, or taxes.

Loudoun County is updating its data center rules to match changes in state code. The piece is about local regulation affecting where and how data centers can be developed in the county, not about a specific project filing or utility commitment.

New Jersey towns are using local bans to stop data centers from being built in their communities. The piece is about siting and local land-use opposition, with the impact falling on residents in the affected towns.

The mayor is starting a 90-day review to write rules for data centers. The piece is about local regulation and what the city may require before more projects move forward.

OpenAI has applied for a permit tied to filling wetlands for a proposed data center site in the Savannah area. The filing speaks to siting and environmental permitting, but it does not say the project has been approved or built, or what power, water, tax, or land terms would apply.

The project is still meeting organized local resistance in Spartanburg, with the dispute centered on whether the data center should go forward in that community. The headline does not say what project-level commitments are on the table for land, water, taxes, or power, only that opposition remains heated.

Florida data center projects are still attracting investment even as local opposition grows. The story appears to focus on siting and community conflict in southwest Florida, with the public fight centered on whether these projects should move forward.

The piece covers local backlash to proposed data centers in Connecticut and the anxiety driving opposition to them. It fits the community and siting beats, with zoning and regulation likely in play, but the excerpt does not say what specific project terms are on the table.