Archive

Opponents of the PAX-1 data center are asking a judge to halt development while related legal challenges proceed. The filing centers on a community and siting fight over whether the project should keep moving before those challenges are resolved.

The piece says a Roanoke-area water authority thinks 2 million gallons a day is enough for the proposed Google data center campus. It is about water supply for a specific project and the local public utility that would serve it.

The piece is framed as a Q&A about data centers in Mississippi, so it appears to explain what they mean for the state and the people living near them. The excerpt does not say whether it covers a specific project, a power deal, water use, tax breaks, or local approvals.

The piece maps data center sites in Alabama and notes their power and water use. It is a state-level siting, power, and water rundown for a specific host location.

Virginia has passed a new data center law, and this piece examines what the law covers and what it leaves out. It appears to be about the state rules that will shape future siting and utility impacts for data centers in Virginia, not about a single project.

Officials in Walls, Mississippi are considering rezoning about 1,000 acres for a proposed data center. The filing, as presented here, says the project is at the land-use stage and does not say what power, water, tax, or community terms would come with it.

The piece is about proposed federal legislation on data centers and how their electricity costs are passed through to ratepayers. It matters for utility customers and developers because it would shape who pays for new large-load demand, but the excerpt does not say what the bill actually requires in detail.

A county in southern Virginia rejected a proposed buildout that paired 12 data centers with a large gas plant. The filing says residents organized against it and the county board voted it down; it does not say the project won any land, water, tax, or power approvals.

The state commission rejected a legal challenge to a proposed data center project in Spartanburg County. The filing does not say what the project will use for power, water, tax treatment, or land commitments.

Effingham County is considering tighter rules on where and how data centers can be built. The piece is about local siting limits and the county’s response to proposed development, not about a specific project filing or utility deal.

A Florida county has changed its zoning rules to allow a data center, which is a siting decision that opens the door to a possible project but does not mean one is committed yet. The excerpt does not say whether a developer has filed plans, what site is involved, or what power, water, tax, or land terms would come with any project.

West Virginia lawmakers were told that data centers could factor into efforts to improve the state’s water situation. The excerpt points to a water and cooling angle, but it does not say what project was discussed, what commitments were made, or whether any site, utility, or developer is already involved.

Duke Energy is proposing separate utility rules for data centers in North Carolina. The piece is about how a utility would structure service terms for a specific class of large load in the state, not about a single project being built.

Duke Energy is said to be considering a large-load tariff that stays light on requirements for big power users. The piece appears to focus on how that pricing approach could affect who pays for the added grid burden in Duke's territory.

Five US grid operators are asking for more time on FERC’s deadline for handling data center power requests. The filing, as described here, concerns how utilities and grid operators manage large-load interconnection and tariff rules, not a specific project site or commitment.

The piece is about a Duke Energy tariff fight in Florida and how it could affect what data center load pays for under utility rate rules. It centers on power costs and ratepayer protections, not on a specific project buildout.

Loudoun County supervisors are set to discuss whether to impose a moratorium on new data center development. The piece is about local siting rules and county approval, with no details in the excerpt on any power, water, tax, or land commitments by a specific project.

Stokes County commissioners approved rezoning tied to a proposed data center project. The filing does not say whether the project has secured power, water, tax terms, or any other local commitments.

DeKalb County has halted a proposed 1 million-square-foot data center plan. The piece is about local siting and permitting in Georgia, and it also points to another data center proposal surfacing elsewhere in the state, but the excerpt does not say whether the project involved power, water, tax terms, or land assembly details.

The piece is about how data center growth can affect electric bills and utility rates for South Carolina customers. It appears to focus on the power cost side of hosting new load, not on a specific project or site.

The piece is about a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission order that would require grid operators to rewrite interconnection and tariff rules for large data center loads. It concerns how new data center demand is handled on the power side, not a specific site, land deal, or water commitment.

Brookfield is said to be planning a large data center campus at the DOE’s Kentucky nuclear enrichment site. The filing or report, as given, does not say how the project will be powered, whether it will use water, what land or tax terms are involved, or what local approvals are still needed.