Archive

The piece is about a proposed AI campus on 747 acres with nine buildings and a very large electricity demand, which puts siting and power use at the center of the project. The excerpt does not say whether the project has utility approvals, water agreements, tax incentives, or zoning outcomes.

New York officials are reviewing a proposed data center with attention to utility costs, water use, and neighborhood effects. The filing, as described, points to community and resource questions rather than a confirmed build decision, and it does not state any final site approval or cost terms.

Residents in Hudspeth County say they were not informed early enough about a proposed $15 billion data center plan. The piece is about local siting and community notice around a proposed project in Texas, with water and cooling concerns in the background.

Glendale approved a proposed data center campus tied to a large gas-fired power plant, which puts the project squarely in power and siting. The excerpt does not say what water supply, cooling method, tax treatment, or utility cost terms the project will use.

Pennsylvania's new executive order forces data center developers to self-supply power within their grid zone before the state will even review a permit.

Pennsylvania's new executive order forces data center developers to self-supply power within their grid zone before the state will even review a permit.

A proposed data center complex in Dauphin County could take the place of an earlier warehouse plan. The filing, as presented here, does not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments the project makes.

The piece is about a new AWWA report meant to help water utilities assess proposed data center development. It points to utility planning and water-use evaluation, but the excerpt does not say what a specific project commits to or name any particular site.

The piece is about data center-driven water demand in Arizona and how that pressure affects local water supplies. It appears to connect AI infrastructure with utility and cooling use in the state, but the excerpt does not specify a particular project, operator, or financing deal.

A proposed data center is the subject of a health-impact study, and the developer’s side disputes the study’s conclusions. The filing, as described here, concerns the water and cooling implications of a specific project and the public controversy around it, not an operating facility.

Oklahoma City has approved zoning for a large data center project, which is a land-use step rather than a final commitment to build. The excerpt does not say whether the project has secured power, water, financing, or other permits, so those pieces remain unspecified.

The piece is about a proposed state bill aimed at protecting the Mahomet Aquifer from data center development, and the village’s support for those protections. It concerns water use and local siting rules, with the project details still at the proposal and legislative stage.

The piece is about a proposed data center campus in Eatonton, Georgia and says the developer is aiming for a future opening. The excerpt does not say what land has been secured, how power will be supplied, whether water use has been committed, or what taxes or incentives are attached.

TerraWatt presented its Riverbend data center proposal at an open house in Alton. The excerpt does not say what the project commits the host to on power, water, tax terms, or land use, or what questions were raised at the event.

The piece appears to cover answers from Beacon to questions from Darby about the Dove Creek data center, with the excerpt pointing to water and cooling issues. It does not say the project has been approved, what it will use for power, or what specific commitments it makes on land, tax, or utility supply.

Cheyenne and Arapaho tribal citizens voted 261-83 to ban data center construction for three years, turning down a deal Governor Wassana said could have brought $200 million a year.

Cheyenne and Arapaho tribal citizens voted 261-83 to ban data center construction for three years, turning down a deal Governor Wassana said could have brought $200 million a year.

The piece is about Meta’s proposed data center and what it would require from the host community, with emphasis on power, water, and limited public disclosure. It fits the publication because it treats the project as a local siting and utility burden story rather than a company profile.

The piece says the Berry Hill Megasite is planned for 21 data center buildings over 15 years. It signals a long-build siting project, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are already in place.

Amazon is presenting water-usage and dewatering details to a county advisory board, so the filing is about local water impacts tied to a proposed data center project. The excerpt also says Microsoft postponed, but it does not explain whether that change affects the same site or a separate project.

The piece says Meta's Huntsville data center is not increasing electric rates, according to the company. That puts the focus on local utility costs and rate impacts for the Alabama host community, while leaving open what other power or water burdens the site may create.

The piece is about a rural Nevada data center and the local governments that are still backing it despite local opposition. The filing points to a community fight over whether the project should go forward and what it could mean for water use and local decision-making; it does not, from the excerpt, specify the project's full power, tax, or land terms.