Archive

Calexico has made its ban on data centers permanent, which is a siting and community decision for the city. The excerpt does not say whether any specific project was proposed there, what prompted the ban, or whether the city linked it to power, water, land-use, or tax terms.

Opponents of the PAX-1 data center are asking a judge to halt development while related legal challenges proceed. The filing centers on a community and siting fight over whether the project should keep moving before those challenges are resolved.

The piece is about local officials in Angelina County encouraging an AI data center project to locate there. It points to siting and public incentives, but the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, or tax terms were actually committed.

The piece is about the public fight over data center expansion and the energy costs tied to it. It points to Congress as the place where proposals to protect consumers from rising power bills are being discussed, but the excerpt does not identify a specific project, host site, utility deal, or local approval.

A coalition is asking Guilford County to impose a long pause on data center approvals. The piece is about local opposition and county siting policy, and it does not say the proposal has been adopted or describe any utility, tax, or land deal.

The piece is about Minnesota's data center expansion and the strain it puts on energy supply, water use, and local decision-making. It frames the issue as a dispute over public costs and approvals, not as a project announcement.

Westlake officials say construction is starting on a data center near Keller in North Texas. The excerpt does not say what the project needs in power, water, land, tax support, or community approvals.

The piece is about congressional pressure on data centers as political pushback builds ahead of the midterms. It points to the community and policy side of data center siting rather than a specific project, utility deal, or construction plan.

The piece appears to summarize how county-level opposition to data centers varies by technology and place. It is about siting and community response, with the legal and local-government angle tied to where projects may face moratoriums or approval fights.

This is about a Colorado data center bill and the pushback it is drawing over how ratepayer protections would work. The excerpt does not say which project or site is affected, or whether the bill changes land, water, taxes, or only utility costs.

The piece appears to be about Ohio lawmakers and data center tax policy, with the focus on incentives and the political trouble around them. It points to a project-level money story in the Midwest and does not say anything about a specific site, utility deal, water use, or construction plan.

Harmony is advancing a revised proposed ordinance for data centers. The filing does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments any specific project would bring, only that local rules are being updated before any siting decision.

Residents in Jim Hogg County are objecting to a proposed large data center. The filing only shows local concern around the project and does not say what land, power, water, tax, or approval commitments the proposal would require.

The piece is framed as a Q&A about data centers in Mississippi, so it appears to explain what they mean for the state and the people living near them. The excerpt does not say whether it covers a specific project, a power deal, water use, tax breaks, or local approvals.

Officials in Walls, Mississippi are considering rezoning about 1,000 acres for a proposed data center. The filing, as presented here, says the project is at the land-use stage and does not say what power, water, tax, or community terms would come with it.

The piece is about Indiana weighing how data center growth would affect its energy system and the local deal-making around hosting those projects. The headline and excerpt point to policy and incentive questions, but they do not say which project is involved or what specific commitments were made.

Microsoft’s data center proposal is back in front of Cherry Valley, so the local siting debate is still active. The excerpt does not say what land use changes, utility commitments, water supply terms, or tax package are on the table, if any.

Residents are suing over noise from a data center tied to Elon Musk. The piece centers on community opposition and a local quality-of-life dispute, not on the project’s power, water, tax, or land terms.

A new lawsuit has been filed against a data center construction project in Spartanburg County. The filing points to another round of local opposition over whether the project should proceed as planned.

Tucson is preparing changes aimed at large water users, which puts the city’s water rules and local development costs in focus. The excerpt says advocates think the proposed changes do not go far enough, but it does not say which projects or users would be covered, or what standards would change.

The piece is about an Upper Burrell data center plan and the rule that the project must bring its own gas-fired power. That puts the focus on project siting and power, with local opposition and moratorium politics in the background.

The piece is about a proposed data center in Trenton and the public concern that the project is not being disclosed clearly enough. It points to a community-facing siting issue and likely a local approval process, but the excerpt does not say what utilities, tax terms, or land commitments the project includes.