Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 4 of 30.
The piece is about Texas data center developers facing a new dispute over power, with the immediate risk framed around a very large amount of planned load. It points to a project-level electricity problem in Texas, not a cloud software or chip story, and it does not say the projects are canceled.
Clarksville is moving ahead with a water plant overhaul, and Microsoft is paying for the work. The filing does not say in the excerpt how the plant will change operations, what water impacts are expected, or whether the arrangement includes any tax or land terms.
Oregon voters approved a charter amendment that restricts data centers, which is a local land-use and regulatory action affecting where projects can be built. The excerpt does not say what limits the amendment imposes, whether any specific project is affected, or how it changes power, water, or tax commitments.
Ohio is being added to a larger wave of local resistance to data centers. The piece says ballot and policy pushes around disclosure and grid protection could shape how future projects are reviewed, but it does not describe a specific project commitment to land, water, taxes, or power.
The piece is about a county commission shake-up in Box Elder County after a data center dispute. It points to local political fallout from siting controversy, but the excerpt does not say anything about new project commitments on power, water, tax, or land.
Central Ohio voters are weighing local limits on data center development, with the dispute centered on how large these projects can be and what conditions they face. The excerpt points to a community and zoning fight, with the water and cooling issue also in view, but it does not specify any particular project commitments or deal terms.
Voters in Pataskala and Granville backed a ban on large data centers. The filing does not say whether any specific project was planned there, so the main effect is on future siting and local land use in those communities.
Urbana voters appear to have backed a ban on data centers and a recall of the mayor in the same election. The piece is about local opposition to a proposed data center build and the community response around it.
A proposed large data center is moving into Cochise County, and the first community meeting is now on the calendar. The filing as presented does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the project, only that local residents will get a chance to hear about it.
The piece is about developers looking at golf courses as potential sites for data centers, with water savings used as part of the pitch. It concerns land use and siting, and it hints at water as a project tradeoff, but it does not say which specific projects moved forward or what any host community agreed to.
The Florida Public Service Commission rejected Duke Energy’s proposed data center plan, so the project does not yet have the regulatory green light it would need to move forward. The filing, as described here, centers on power and utility regulation in Florida; it does not say what specific load, tariff terms, land setup, or water arrangement were involved.
The piece says PJM has revised its data center backstop procurement plan and that ICF sees the change as lowering utility risk. It is about power-market rules for large loads and how those rules affect utilities in PJM territory.
The piece says Microsoft’s proposed Indiana data center has cleared another procedural step, with groundwater approval and air permit review moving ahead. It does not say the project is built, how much power or water it will use, or what tax or land terms are attached.
The piece focuses on a Pennsylvania town weighing data center development, with residents split between opposition and support. It appears to center on local siting and community response, and the excerpt does not say whether the project has committed specific power, water, tax, or land terms.
Residents in Brazoria County are pushing back against a proposed data center, and the story centers on local opposition in a place where county officials have limited tools to block it. The filing does not say that the project has been approved or built, and it does not spell out the site's power, water, tax, or land terms.
The piece is about a proposed Senate bill that could shift a large cost onto data center operators. It is a policy and taxation story about who would bear the financial burden, not a report on a specific site or project.
The piece is about a proposed data center in Campbell County and the concerns nearby residents are raising about it. The excerpt points to a local siting and community fight, and the source label suggests water and cooling are part of the concern, but it does not say the project’s full power, tax, or land terms.
Amazon is proposing a large data center campus in West Richland, with the filing describing a possible buildout of up to 21 buildings. The piece points to local impacts through jobs and likely utility use, but the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project has actually secured.
BPI's dividend model cites a Louisiana parish payment far above its own projected household range, raising questions as counties weigh revenue-sharing deals without new taxes.
BPI's dividend model cites a Louisiana parish payment far above its own projected household range, raising questions as counties weigh revenue-sharing deals without new taxes.
The piece is about OpenAI floating a plan for data center power plants and how that would affect the local grid and nearby communities. It does not say that a specific project has been approved, built, or funded, and it does not give project-level details on site, water use, tax terms, or land.
The piece summarizes public opposition to data center proposals, with water concerns showing up most often in the comments and meeting records. It also suggests many local discussions proceed without visible project supporters, but it does not identify a specific site, utility deal, land action, or approval outcome.
The filing points to state review of gas-fueled power for a proposed 2 GW data center at Shippingport. It concerns electricity supply and the siting of a large load in western Pennsylvania, but it does not say the project is approved or fully built.
A judge let a lawsuit proceed over pollution from the Mississippi facility tied to xAI and SpaceX. The filing says the plant uses gas turbines and alleges the site has significant nitrogen oxide and formaldehyde emissions, but it does not say the project has been halted or that any permit outcome has changed.
The piece concerns Pennsylvania’s data center tax exemption and the debate around keeping or changing it. It is about state tax policy for a specific class of projects, not a site buildout itself.