Archive
(169 Total Articles)Page 4 of 4.
The state commission rejected a legal challenge to a proposed data center project in Spartanburg County. The filing does not say what the project will use for power, water, tax treatment, or land commitments.
Effingham County is considering tighter rules on where and how data centers can be built. The piece is about local siting limits and the county’s response to proposed development, not about a specific project filing or utility deal.
Leavenworth County is holding a special meeting so nearby residents can weigh in on a proposed 1,000-acre data center site. The filing says this is about local opposition and neighbor input; it does not say the project has been approved, nor does it give details on power, water, tax terms, or land commitments beyond the acreage mentioned.
The council declined to revisit a data center agreement, which keeps the deal in place for now. The excerpt does not say what project terms were under review, what concessions were attached, or whether the decision involved land, power, water, or tax treatment.
New York is considering a community investment requirement tied to data center size, with the burden framed as dollars per megawatt. The excerpt does not say whether this is a passed rule, a proposal, or how it would be enforced.
A Florida county has changed its zoning rules to allow a data center, which is a siting decision that opens the door to a possible project but does not mean one is committed yet. The excerpt does not say whether a developer has filed plans, what site is involved, or what power, water, tax, or land terms would come with any project.
West Virginia lawmakers were told that data centers could factor into efforts to improve the state’s water situation. The excerpt points to a water and cooling angle, but it does not say what project was discussed, what commitments were made, or whether any site, utility, or developer is already involved.
The piece is about Texas data center jobs and the lack of a public statewide count. On the excerpt provided, it points to the jobs and incentives side of data center development in Texas, but it does not say how many jobs any specific project promises or what tax deal is attached.
The item appears to be about data center companies holding talks in Port Washington, which points to local project siting and possible incentives discussion. The excerpt does not say what was proposed, whether any land, power, water, or tax commitment was made, or what the companies asked for.
Aurora is considering setback rules that would limit how close data centers can be built to homes. The piece is about local siting and neighborhood impact, with the practical question being how the city balances project location against nearby residents.
North Carolina officials say they will enforce a new federal pledge tied to Duke Energy’s data center load. The filing points to power and tariff rules, not a specific site or construction commitment.
The House is set to consider a bill that would try to limit how much data center electricity demand is passed through to other customers. The excerpt does not say which projects, utilities, or states would be covered, or what specific cost rule the bill would change.
Loudoun County supervisors are set to discuss whether to impose a moratorium on new data center development. The piece is about local siting rules and county approval, with no details in the excerpt on any power, water, tax, or land commitments by a specific project.
Stokes County commissioners approved rezoning tied to a proposed data center project. The filing does not say whether the project has secured power, water, tax terms, or any other local commitments.
The bill would pause new AI data center construction and approvals in New Jersey for six months. It is a state-level siting and community fight about whether projects can move forward at all, not a project approval itself.
The story says Texas governor Greg Abbott is ordering penalties for data centers that do not report water use. It concerns state oversight of water disclosure by a data-center sector in Texas, but the excerpt does not say which projects are covered or what penalties would apply.
A Secaucus data center is tied to a diesel spill that reached a Hackensack River tributary. The filing, as presented here, does not say whether the spill came from backup generation, what caused it, or what cleanup, fines, or operational changes followed.
Property owners have pulled back an annexation request tied to a proposed Amazon data center, which means the siting path for the project is now less certain. The filing does not say whether the project is dead, only that this land step has been withdrawn.
Pennsylvania regulators are asking whether the state’s grid can absorb more data center load without hurting reliability. The piece centers on power planning for a proposed buildout, with the public utility commission and PJM in the background, and it does not say that any specific project has won final approval or secured power.