Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 4 of 18.
The piece is about a proposed data center project in Coshocton County and the developer’s emphasis on being transparent with local residents as the project moves forward. The excerpt does not say anything about power supply, water use, taxes, land deals, or approvals.
Prince George’s County is considering a bill that could stop a proposed data center at the former Landover Mall site. The piece is about local siting and a county-level land-use fight, not about power, water, or tax terms that have been disclosed.
Residents in Upper Hanover, Pennsylvania, blocked a proposed data center on 37 acres after organizing against the plan. The piece is about local opposition and a site proposal that did not go forward, not about power, water, or tax commitments.
Local officials and residents in southeast Georgia are facing a wave of proposed data center development and the land-use and community questions that come with it. The excerpt does not say which projects are involved, what power or water supply they would need, or whether any approvals have been filed or granted.
West Virginia lawmakers have taken county governments out of the decision-making process for data center projects, while residents are still protesting a rumored proposal. The filing points to a siting and local-governance fight, but it does not identify a specific project, operator, or any power, water, tax, or land terms tied to the rumored site.
Pennsylvania's new executive order forces data center developers to self-supply power within their grid zone before the state will even review a permit.
Pennsylvania's new executive order forces data center developers to self-supply power within their grid zone before the state will even review a permit.
Palo and Grimes are working on rules for data centers, so this is a local regulation story tied to siting and community controls. The excerpt does not say what the rules would require, whether they touch power, water, taxes, or land, or whether any project is already proposed.
The piece is about rural Alabama residents pushing back over concerns that a proposed data center could affect health and water conditions in their area. It centers on local opposition and the community impacts of a specific project, not on the operator's business or technical specifications.
The piece is about Ohio opposition to data-center development and how that backlash is affecting election politics. It points to community resistance and siting fights rather than any specific project cost, utility deal, or tax package.
A proposed data center is the subject of a health-impact study, and the developer’s side disputes the study’s conclusions. The filing, as described here, concerns the water and cooling implications of a specific project and the public controversy around it, not an operating facility.
League City changed its development rules so data centers now need a special use permit. The filing does not say which project would be affected, what conditions the city would attach, or whether any land, power, water, tax, or community impacts were identified.
San Diego city officials delayed a proposed data center after residents spoke against it at City Council. The excerpt points to a local siting and community fight, but it does not say what commitments the project made on land, power, water, taxes, or approvals beyond the delay.
Delhi Township is cutting off its relationship with LEAP after a proposed $10 billion data center plan. The filing points to local opposition and a siting fight, but it does not say the project has been approved or built, or spell out the land, power, water, or tax terms.
The filing says a lawsuit is challenging approvals tied to changes for a large Pennsylvania data center project and a natural-gas power plant. It points to a legal fight over siting and power approvals, but the excerpt does not say what the changes were or how the project would affect land, water, taxes, or local utilities.
The piece appears to cover a state data center map, the number of facilities in the state, and criticism from opponents. Based on the headline and excerpt, it points to siting and community reaction, with a possible policy or transparency angle, but it does not say what specific project commitments or filings are involved.
The piece is about xAI in Mississippi paying nearby homeowners to settle noise-related complaints around a data center. It concerns community opposition and a legal pressure point tied to the project, not the company’s general business.
A local group has gathered enough signatures to force a special election on whether Heath should ban data centers. The story is about community opposition and local land-use rules, not the project’s power, water, or tax terms.
The piece is about a proposed state bill aimed at protecting the Mahomet Aquifer from data center development, and the village’s support for those protections. It concerns water use and local siting rules, with the project details still at the proposal and legislative stage.
Gregg Township approved a conditional use tied to a proposed data center. The filing does not say what land, power, water, or tax terms are attached, so this is only a land-use approval, not a full account of the project’s resource or fiscal footprint.
TerraWatt presented its Riverbend data center proposal at an open house in Alton. The excerpt does not say what the project commits the host to on power, water, tax terms, or land use, or what questions were raised at the event.
The piece is about a proposed large data center project near Lansing and the pushback around it. It points to community opposition and the local siting fight, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, land, or approval terms the project actually commits to.
The piece appears to cover answers from Beacon to questions from Darby about the Dove Creek data center, with the excerpt pointing to water and cooling issues. It does not say the project has been approved, what it will use for power, or what specific commitments it makes on land, tax, or utility supply.
The piece is about New Kent officials weighing draft guidelines for data centers, which puts the focus on local siting rules and the county’s control over how projects would be reviewed. The excerpt does not say whether any project was approved, what specific standards are proposed, or whether the guidelines affect taxes, water, or power.
Local officials approved a moratorium tied to a proposed data center, which keeps the project from moving forward for now. The piece says concerns about the project's impact remain, but it does not spell out any power, water, tax, or land commitment from the developer.